X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD35DB087 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:01:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58726-05 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 03:01:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [151.155.5.143]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFECDAFCF for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:55:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [172.16.1.100] grzm [61.197.227.146] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 1.6 $ on Linux via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:55:21 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4357B9F3.8060902@nac.net> References: <4357B9F3.8060902@nac.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: postgresql sql list Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Glaesemann Subject: Re: Article on Oracle & MySQL in E-week Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:55:17 +0900 To: wanderson@nac.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.269 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.269] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/278 X-Sequence-Number: 23131 On Oct 21, 2005, at 0:38 , Wendell Anderson wrote: > You are quite incorrect in stating that MySQL can now claim > "parity" with > PostgreSQL through it's release of version 5.0. Mr Anderson, Who are you writing to? cegarry(at)yahoo.com? Are you referring to this article? http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1876702,00.asp I skimmed it, but didn't see any mention of PostgreSQL. Perhaps I missed it, or perhaps you mean another article? Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com