X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91934D1B4F1 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:03:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82199-07 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:02:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from shire.ontko.com (shire.ontko.com [199.164.165.1]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A33FD1B531 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:02:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from nick (bilbo.ontko.com [199.164.165.101]) by shire.ontko.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with SMTP id hAAL2m5f007251 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:02:50 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Nick Fankhauser" To: "PGSQL-SQL" Subject: Is there a more elegant way to write this query?... Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:02:35 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/99 X-Sequence-Number: 15914 Hi- I'm suffering from a performance problem, but when I look at my query, I'm not convinced that there isn't a better way to handle this in SQL. -So I'm seeking advice here before I go to the performance list. I have three tables- case, actor and actor_case_assignment. As the names imply, actor_case_assignment contains records that assign an actor to a case. Actors such as attorneys or judges may have many cases, while the average actor (we hope) only has one. What I'm trying to do is link these tables to get back a single row per actor that shows the actor's name, the number of cases that actor is assigned to, and if they only have one case, I want the number for that case. This means I have to do some grouping to get the case count, but I'm then forced to use an aggregate function like max on the other fields. I hope there's a better way. Any suggestions? Here's what I'm using right now: select actor.actor_id, max(actor.actor_full_name), max(case_data.case_public_id), max(case_data.case_id), count(case_data.case_id) as case_count from actor, actor_case_assignment, case_data where actor.actor_full_name_uppercase like upper('martin%') and actor.actor_id = actor_case_assignment.actor_id and case_data.case_id = actor_case_assignment.case_id group by actor.actor_id order by max(actor.actor_full_name), case_count desc, limit 1000; Thanks! -Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- Nick Fankhauser nickf@doxpop.com Phone 1.765.965.7363 Fax 1.765.962.9788 doxpop - Court records at your fingertips - http://www.doxpop.com/