Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A8475F28 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:26:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from chimta05.algx.net (mta6.algx.net [67.92.168.235]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CDD475F09 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:26:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from JHS ([67.92.23.74]) by chimmx05.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.4 (built Aug 5 2002)) with SMTP id <0H5S00765AEABQ@chimmx05.algx.net> for pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:08:34 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:04:00 -0500 From: Jason Hihn Subject: Re: Press Release -- Just Waiting for Tom In-reply-to: <1037642739.21511.8.camel@camel> To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/176 X-Sequence-Number: 345 I wasn't trying to use any formatting. The CGI did that all on it's own... It put my comments into the PRE block of the annoucement. Maybe moving the closing PRE tag is all it will need? -----Original Message----- From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:06 PM To: Jason Hihn Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Press Release -- Just Waiting for Tom On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 11:39, Jason Hihn wrote: > FYI. I just tried to add a comment to the page, and I got
rather > than the formatting of a hard-return and bolding. (i.e. "
2002/11/18 > 10:22 EST (via web):
" appeared rather than it formatted. > perhaps comments don't allow html formatting? Justin, can you confirm this? > I'll also ask what I asked there, here: > Are there any new replication/backup features? > There haven't been major changes in these areas. There are some commercial companies that are offering replication solutions you can look at. I also know Point In Time Recovery is planned for version 7.4 as well. BTW - A complete list of changes is included in the source distributions if you want to check for something specific. Robert Treat > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Josh Berkus > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 2:44 PM > To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Press Release -- Just Waiting for Tom > > > Folks, > > Thank you, everyone, for you help with the press release. The only > thing we're waiting on, I believe, is a quote from Tom Lane on the new > release. Last-minute copy edits, please, people? > > http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Pressrelease73 > > And can anyone persuade Tom to cough up a quote in the next 36 hours? > > -Josh Berkus >