X-Original-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2535E47658E
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  7 May 2003 16:31:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kronos.honk.org (kronos.honk.org [206.191.41.253])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0CD476588
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  7 May 2003 16:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kronos.honk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kronos.honk.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h47KJAbM026439;
	Wed, 7 May 2003 16:19:11 -0400
Received: from localhost (jearle@localhost)
	by kronos.honk.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) with ESMTP id
	h47KJAKa026435; Wed, 7 May 2003 16:19:10 -0400
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 16:19:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Earle <je_pgsql@kronos.honk.org>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Qs
In-Reply-To: <1052337828.21371.15.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305071617380.26434@kronos.honk.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305071232370.25576@kronos.honk.org>
	<200305071832.22529.dev@archonet.com>
	<1052337828.21371.15.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.8 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,
	USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200305/223
X-Sequence-Number: 41878

On Wed, 7 May 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:

> I assume he is using Debian stable, which has 7.2.1 (and will have for
> evermore, dammit!, until the next stable release.)

Yes, that's what I'm using (v7.2.1-2woody2).  Is it worth upgrading?

Cheers!
Jon

-- 
Jon Earle

SAVE FARSCAPE http://www.savefarscape.com/

While it's okay to disagree with your friends and family, childish insults
do not express sovereignty.