Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AC09FB367 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:02:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75905-07 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:02:31 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sn.sai.msu.ru (sn.sai.msu.ru [195.208.220.215]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCB99FB272 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:02:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from sn.sai.msu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sn.sai.msu.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l27J2PqR015269; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:02:25 +0300 Received: from localhost (megera@localhost) by sn.sai.msu.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l27J2PmO015266; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:02:25 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: sn.sai.msu.ru: megera owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:02:25 +0300 (MSK) From: Oleg Bartunov X-X-Sender: megera@sn.sai.msu.ru To: Sumeet cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: tesearch2 question In-Reply-To: <7539aebb0703070746y5d3b779dlf9d37eea3caf5de@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <7539aebb0703070746y5d3b779dlf9d37eea3caf5de@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.189 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200703/73 X-Sequence-Number: 27711 On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Sumeet wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to udpate a table containing 13149741 records. And its taking > forever to complete this process. > > The update query i'm trying to run is for full text indexing similiar to > > UPDATE tblMessages SET idxFTI=to_tsvector(strMessage); > How big are your strMessage ? and what's your tsearch2 configuration ? Can you estimate how long takes updating, for example, 1000 rows ? It looks like your system is IO bound. What's your hardware ? > > Below are some of the stats which might be helpful for analyzing this > > $top > > PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND > 3091 postgres 1 43 0 46M 38M cpu/1 200:06 3.20% postgres > 5052 postgres 1 60 0 149M 134M sleep 0:17 3.12% postgres > > << running almost for a day and a half and it is still running, > > This table which i'm trying to update has 10 indexes > > ========================================================= > "a_article_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id) > "a_article_uk_pmid" UNIQUE, btree (pmid) > "a_article_idx_abstract" btree ("substring"(abstract::text, 0, 255)) > "a_article_idx_date_cr_year" btree (date_cr_year) > "a_article_idx_ml_journal_info_medline_ta" btree (ml_journal_info_a_ta) > "a_article_idx_owner" btree ("owner") > "a_article_idx_pmid" btree (pmid) > "a_article_idx_status" btree (status) > "a_article_idx_title" btree (article_title) > "a_master_t_idx_year_published" btree (published_year) > ======================================================== > But no indexes on the field i'm trying to update. The field i'm trying to > add is a new field. > Can anyone help me out to figure out why is it taking so much time to update > the table. > > Also as u see in the above indexes, I have some indexes on some varchar > column which i feel are totally useless unless u so a exact string match. > But does that help in any sense for improving the speed of retreiving the > string just normally without any search on it? > > Thanks, > Sumeet. > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83