Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842F2477719
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2002 05:43:20 -0400 (EDT)
Mailbox-Line: From jgmischke@j-g-m.de  Tue Jul  9 05:43:20 2002
Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [64.49.215.80])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1434777B9
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2002 03:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by news.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 8)
	id 93AA6381CA5; Tue,  9 Jul 2002 03:04:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: JGM <jgmischke@j-g-m.de>
X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.sql
Subject: Waiting for Update
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:04:40 +0200
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <age1u4$1cl6$1@news.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: news@hub.org
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FROM_NAME_NO_SPACES,PORN_10
	version=2.30
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200207/120
X-Sequence-Number: 8499

Could it be true??

I've a table with < 46000 rows. And a little Update like

UPDATE foo set xxx = 'X';

needs about 15 seconds???

What's wrong?

Greetings 

Juergen