X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D169FA38F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:41:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52787-04 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:41:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2566E9FA1A8 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:41:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so59141ugf for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:41:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ICOgws2VKh7xWv3fqMgTAWwLMI/3jbtfuwC5HQu+pjHEAOyw7kTmZrKOT/szg/1mmiQmlyejiaQFoHPCYA4u9h5A+sPNY93xe+e+/tgzWjTKZfn/yQAybszu1Of+yZ5Ab/LbGZwgpBD4/NNH0Xxj8PBoMBXHOTl3US5UuAcFzq0= Received: by 10.67.30.6 with SMTP id h6mr126035ugj; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.20.12 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:41:18 -0500 From: "Aaron Bono" To: phillips@weatherbeeta.com.au Subject: Re: COPY to table with array columns (Longish) Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <003201c68f40$3e392850$9b0014ac@ITPhil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <003201c68f40$3e392850$9b0014ac@ITPhil> X-Google-Sender-Auth: feee214bddbf10fe X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/142 X-Sequence-Number: 25378 I guess I still don't understand... If you take the approach operationsengineer1 and I suggested, you should only need 3 or 4 tables regardless of the number of SYS file records. Good luck with your implementation. -Aaron On 6/13/06, Phillip Smith wrote: > Thanks Aaron - There are currently 8175 records in my SYS file - I might > need to go with this approach but be selective about which items I export so > I don't end up with 8000 tables related to SYS! There's probably a lot of > **** in there that doesn't actually need to be exported. > > Thanks again, > -p