X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621729FB303 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:48:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01867-03 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:48:14 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF8E9FB2FF for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:48:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y25so708615nfb for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:48:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=EARQPakBD2JaYpewKMUke0eoORscUggJ/wkzCe3kAwSu3jB0jhf8Ut128+qLdURb41nM+MxBRA5WB/kxqUEoc1QAWgkOiHsS7sEMP9A4qM2t1qG9Z2+W00FKuTplF2TRDbeyB+kOUy8/7iY9rHlSGUL2auIDFoGW+apQF8T3idA= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr1773818hue; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.29.2 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:48:12 -0500 From: "Aaron Bono" To: "Kevin Bednar" Subject: Re: MS-SQL<->Postgres sync Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_34049_26142391.1152550092511" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: f22fc30718625e1b X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200607/149 X-Sequence-Number: 25723 ------=_Part_34049_26142391.1152550092511 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/10/06, Kevin Bednar wrote: > > Looking to keep 2 databases in sync, at least semi-realtime if possible, > although running a batch update every x mins wouldn't be out of the > question. One db is postgres and the other is ms-sql. It's to keep inventory > in sync from 2 seperate locations, one being a brick and mortar store and > the other an ecommerce system for a web site. Any and all help is > appreciated since I can't find much of anything on syncing these 2 database > systems! > > > Kevin Bednar > Can you provide more information about what data is needing to be fed back and forth? Are both databases being updated or can you set one as the system of record? Why can't you have the web site read directly from MS SQL Server? With a little more information we can provide more useful advice. Thanks, Aaron ------=_Part_34049_26142391.1152550092511 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/10/06, Kevin Bednar <kevin@stockwelldesigngroup.com> wrote:
Looking to keep 2 databases in sync, at least semi-realtime if possible, although running a batch update every x mins wouldn't be out of the question. One db is postgres and the other is ms-sql. It's to keep inventory in sync from 2 seperate locations, one being a brick and mortar store and the other an ecommerce system for a web site. Any and all help is appreciated since I can't find much of anything on syncing these 2 database systems!
 

Kevin Bednar

Can you provide more information about what data is needing to be fed back and forth?  Are both databases being updated or can you set one as the system of record?  Why can't you have the web site read directly from MS SQL Server?

With a little more information we can provide more useful advice.

Thanks,
Aaron

------=_Part_34049_26142391.1152550092511--