X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24B7D1DF5D for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:51:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82935-05 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:51:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from wolverine.lercnetworks.com (sabertooth.lercnetworks.com [140.99.13.90]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF1ED1D614 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:51:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 510) by wolverine.lercnetworks.com with local; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:32:13 -0400 References: <200404222346.i3MNk0b24607@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200404222346.i3MNk0b24607@candle.pha.pa.us> From: "Dennis" To: Bruce Momjian Cc: postgres SQL Subject: Re: lifetime of temp schema versus compiled image of plpgsql proc Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:32:13 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/240 X-Sequence-Number: 17615 Bruce Momjian writes: > > There is an FAQ item on this --- use EXECUTE. So I should be using EXECUTE for all access to the temp tables? ie inserts, and selects (in this case). Should I use execute for the table creation? Dennis