Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4EB2E002C for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:22:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10706-04 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:22:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.230]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4552E002D for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:22:07 -0400 (AST) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id o12so361987qba.17 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:22:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qW9AFVKi/IQZJ3Bt5XWHNHo+ebC8LguUGZnSrTezuUY=; b=fwAswsHaqr75mXC0z/8mr6uca9mOquEVdjw3dwPbgAdmOFS/SBdC0JkAt5iQgG9zlZiUcu3SK8pjGyJDFzn7lkV0olEgWcdcjvNKsm8lo3EOUNF7lZIjptmMdfzifZUSjSzIa5Tj6MRGa1oSdkVItJ9jwR40qh/sb1dnb+lzmwQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H2xpheod4tp1VVLZTN2sGJuEGY75qd0PyCs/Z1EqiCGQMt4RP3MtgiCrs6CrLLtK2fS8Ca4UJReEHCzv/F/bPgheuEFeQkOlV+H5p9x5oUi1FgvKuzEcIdMAoyVJQMKUVAeNI7KO8liDLtT9t2nvUgLj+f5StUE+Ly39HjFFdI4= Received: by 10.114.52.1 with SMTP id z1mr3836028waz.123.1203139327178; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.131.4 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:22:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:22:07 -0600 From: "Scott Marlowe" To: "Bryce Nesbitt" Subject: Re: Backward compatibility psql 8.1 to 8.2 Cc: "Richard Huxton" , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <47B66740.3010401@obviously.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47B1573C.9070402@obviously.com> <47B159B7.1010807@archonet.com> <47B66740.3010401@obviously.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200802/138 X-Sequence-Number: 30229 Up until 8.2 I never used packages because I ran RH or FC and built from source since 6.5.2 or so. I started using packages with ubuntu, and having 8.0, 8.1, and 8.2 installed at the same time, and it's wonderful for troubleshooting issues that might crop up between versions. The Debian / Ubuntu way is really much better than the rpm one. Does anyone who know about packaging know if this a limitation of the packaging spec in rpm, or is there a relatively simple way to get an rpm based machine to run >1 ver of pgsql at a time? On Feb 15, 2008 10:32 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > I'm running SUSE 10.3. I have to install something behind the back of > the package manager to keep two versions of psql around. Its not the > end of the world, but it's a hassle... and fiddly in it's own right. A > 8.2/8.3 client that could talk to 8.1 would save hassle here. > > Richard Huxton wrote: > > Feasible no doubt, but fiddly and useless to most. > > > > You can have multiple installations on the same machine. I think most > > of the developers do as do many of the rest of us. What platform are > > you running? Debian has built-in support for this, but you can do it > > yourself for most installations. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >