Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A3B6359F9 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:23:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54978-03-4 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:23:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ananke.wxnz.net (ananke.wxnz.net [58.28.4.122]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A6F6360D4 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:21:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from gonzo (ip-118-90-139-59.xdsl.xnet.co.nz [118.90.139.59]) by ananke.wxnz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08893170504 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:21:06 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from news by gonzo with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqeO1-00022d-Ia for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:21:05 +1300 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Path: not-for-mail From: Jasen Betts Newsgroups: gmane.comp.db.postgresql.sql Subject: Re: Private functions Date: 14 Mar 2010 03:21:05 GMT Organization: Dis (not Dat) Organisation Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <4B9BD20B.9090601@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: reversiblemaps.ath.cx 1268536865 7836 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2010 03:21:05 GMT) X-Face: ?)Aw4rXwN5u0~$nqKj`xPz>xHCwgi^q+^?Ri*+R(&uv2=E1Q0Zk(>h!~o2ID@6{uf8s; a +M[5[U[QT7xFN%^gR"=tuJw%TXXR'Fp~W; (T"1(739R%m0Yyyv*gkGoPA.$b,D.w:z+<'"=-lVT?6 {T?=R^:W5g|E2#EhjKCa+nt":4b}dU7GYB*HBxn&Td$@f%.kl^:7X8rQWd[NTc"P"u6nkisze/Q; 8 "9Z{peQF,w)7UjV$c|RO/mQW/NMgWfr5*$-Z%u46"/00mx-,\R'fLPe.)^ User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-2 (Linux) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/71 X-Sequence-Number: 33778 On 2010-03-13, Gianvito Pio wrote: > Hi all, > is there a way to write a function that can only be called by another > function but not directly using SELECT function_name ( )? not really. but there may be another way to get the effect you want.