Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5DB1336B42 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:50:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81433-04 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:50:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F229013364DE for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:50:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRN1s-0005ra-Dr for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:50:16 +0100 Received: from ppp-188-174-120-55.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([188.174.120.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:50:16 +0100 Received: from spam_eater by ppp-188-174-120-55.dynamic.mnet-online.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:50:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org From: Thomas Kellerer Subject: Re: sqlplus reporting equivalent in postgres? Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:50:06 +0100 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <1291931275.1746.15.camel@tony1.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-188-174-120-55.dynamic.mnet-online.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.899 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201012/60 X-Sequence-Number: 34896 Samuel Gendler wrote on 11.12.2010 04:23: > psql - not as advanced, doesn't have all the features SQL*Plus has. > > > On the other hand, it is at least capable of command history and readline support. Hmm, for me SQL*Plus does support command history, but this is getting off-topic now... Regards Thomas