Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A48F1337B4E for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:34:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01462-02 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:34:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0981337B34 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:34:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppfe3-0006em-0j for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:34:07 +0100 Received: from 217.110.94.67 ([217.110.94.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:34:06 +0100 Received: from spam_eater by 217.110.94.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:34:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org From: Thomas Kellerer Subject: Re: Oracle Equivalent queries in Postgres Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:33:54 +0100 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <4D5BAA07.7060704@subexworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.110.94.67 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.735 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/78 X-Sequence-Number: 35154 Pavel Stehule, 16.02.2011 12:20: >> Unfortunately they are not the same: Oracle does not support >> INFORMATION_SCHEMA >> > > sorry, I expected so all mature databases support it. Yes, this is really hard to understand. I would assume creating the INFORMATION_SCHEMA views based on the existing Oracle views is just a matter of maybe 3-4 days of days work. So it is really not understandable that Oracle does not support this. But then they probably don't care - after all it's Oracle. Regards Thomas