Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FDCB5DC0A for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:58:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08490-04 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:57:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE778B5DBF2 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:57:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5x5M-0000Mb-GO for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:57:52 +0200 Received: from 80.150.102.194 ([80.150.102.194]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:57:52 +0200 Received: from spam_eater by 80.150.102.194 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:57:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org From: Thomas Kellerer Subject: Combining several CTEs with a recursive CTE Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:58:20 +0200 Lines: 41 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.150.102.194 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.459 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.504, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201109/54 X-Sequence-Number: 35854 Hello all, this is more a "just curious" question, rather than a real world problem. We can combine several CTEs into a single select using something like this: WITH cte_1 as ( select .... ), cte_2 as ( select ... where id (select some_col from cte_1) ) select * from cte_2; But this does not seem to work when a recursive CTE is involved WITH cte_1 as ( select .... ), recursive cte_2 as ( select ... where id (select some_col from cte_1) union all select ... ) select * from cte_2; This throws an error: syntax error at or near "cte_2" I'm just wondering if this is intended behavioury, simply not (yet) implemented or even invalid according to the standard? I didn't find any reference that it's not allowed in the manual. Regards Thomas