Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E805B5DC01 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:54:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31617-07 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:54:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E940FB5DC09 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:54:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R61hx-0001pk-Tw for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:01 +0200 Received: from 80.150.102.194 ([80.150.102.194]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:01 +0200 Received: from spam_eater by 80.150.102.194 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org From: Thomas Kellerer Subject: Re: Combining several CTEs with a recursive CTE Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:28 +0200 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <1E5EC0E1-13DB-4346-B8EE-212F4DC4CCEA@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.150.102.194 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 In-Reply-To: <1E5EC0E1-13DB-4346-B8EE-212F4DC4CCEA@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.44 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.504, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 201109/56 X-Sequence-Number: 35856 David Johnston, 20.09.2011 16:15: >> I'm just wondering if this is intended behavioury, simply not (yet) >> implemented or even invalid according to the standard? I didn't >> find any reference that it's not allowed in the manual. >> >> Regards Thomas >> >> > Try sticking the recursive keyword after the "with" if any of the > following CTEs are recursive. > > WITH RECURSIVE normal 1 AS () ,recursine1 AS () ,normal2 AS () > ,recursine2 AS () SELECT ... > > David J. Ah! That does the trick. Thanks Thomas