Received: from druid.net (root@druid.net [198.96.119.226]) by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA33738 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:11:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from localhost (1233 bytes) by druid.net via sendmail with P:stdio/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) (ident using unix) id for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:11:42 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #2 built 1999-Feb-16) Message-Id: Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance In-Reply-To: <001701be6a95$f0aeee20$0b8c5aa5@timnt.weather.net> from Tim Perdue at "Mar 9, 1999 07:33:02 pm" To: perdue@raccoon.com Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:11:42 -0500 (EST) From: "D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain Cc: pgsql-sql@hub.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL50 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thus spake Tim Perdue > Some time back I sent out a message asking if PGSQL would be able to handle > my mailing list archive at http://www.geocrawler.com/ , and whether it would > scale up to 100MB. Cool. We now have a searchable archive for PostgreSQL. However, I tried a search and it didn't seem to work. In pgsql-hackers I entered "niladic" (I tried "Niladic" just in case) and it failed to find any messages, even though I could see a few on the list of recent messages. Any ideas? -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.