Received: from orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de (Tpolaris2.sapham.debis.de [53.2.131.8]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA75218 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:07:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wieck@debis.com) Received: by orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org id m11o9rc-0003kGC; Wed, 17 Nov 99 19:31 MET Message-Id: From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) Subject: Re: [SQL] NULL To: jose@sferacarta.com (jose soares) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 19:31:28 +0100 (MET) Cc: wieck@debis.com, bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Reply-To: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) In-Reply-To: <3832B3FF.A3F3F9F1@sferacarta.com> from "jose soares" at Nov 17, 99 02:56:16 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text > Jan Wieck ha scritto: > > > > - Is it a constraint to allow only NULL values ? (unuseful) > > > > Useless? I NEED IT - URGENT - NOW - YESTERDAY. > > Maybe I miss something here, Jan... Yepp - my smiley on the last line. It wasn't a serious comment. More a joke and I really mean that such a definition is absolutely not needed. Maybe I'm writing too much between the lines. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #