X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22609D1B4E2 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:57:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81416-05 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:56:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from varsoon.wireboard.com (www.wireboard.com [216.151.155.101]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25FDD1B4E8 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:56:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from doug by varsoon.wireboard.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19wPJd-0006GQ-00; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:56:37 -0400 To: Tom Lane Cc: Andreas Pflug , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean References: <15403.1063035632@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3F5CAC68.30502@pse-consulting.de> <19042.1063039625@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Doug McNaught Date: 08 Sep 2003 12:56:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: Tom Lane's message of "Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:47:05 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/559 X-Sequence-Number: 43571 Tom Lane writes: > Doug McNaught writes: > > I agree with another poster that deprecation in 7.4 and removal in > > 7.5 might make sense. > > How would we "deprecate" it exactly? Throw a NOTICE? I was thinking of just a mention in the release notes that we've found this problem and intend to fix it after giving people a release cycle to adjust. Not that people read release notes... :( -Doug