X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350B752A00 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:26:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00703-01 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:26:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from boutiquenumerique.com (boutiquenumerique.com [82.67.9.10]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADC152A46 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:26:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 2769 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2005 00:26:57 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (boutiquenumerique-lists@192.168.0.4) by boutiquenumerique.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2005 00:26:57 +0200 To: "Michael Fuhr" , lmeadors@apache.org Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: getting back autonumber just inserted References: <42CD6B58.6060508@techevolution.be> <20050707201433.94901.qmail@web41013.mail.yahoo.com> <20050707203715.GA26528@winnie.fuhr.org> <20050707205725.GA28200@winnie.fuhr.org> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:26:30 +0200 From: PFC Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?La_Boutique_Num=E9rique?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050707205725.GA28200@winnie.fuhr.org> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Linux, build 1095) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.005 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/48 X-Sequence-Number: 22026 > That's a different issue than whether currval() is subject to > interference from other transactions. And just wait until PostgreSQL > 8.1 comes out and people start using lastval() -- then it could get > *really* confusing which sequence value you're getting. What happens if an INSERT trigger inserts something into another table which also has a sequence ?