X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C461F52AF2
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  8 Jul 2005 13:08:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 91756-01
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  8 Jul 2005 16:08:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from boutiquenumerique.com (boutiquenumerique.com [82.67.9.10])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0BF5286A
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri,  8 Jul 2005 13:08:05 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 30741 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2005 18:08:32 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (boutiquenumerique-lists@192.168.0.4)
	by boutiquenumerique.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2005 18:08:32 +0200
To: "Steve Wampler" <swampler@noao.edu>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Make COUNT(*) Faster?
References: <9EF2931D-1097-470D-8ECB-59D00166C96F@apple.com>
	<60vf3mklue.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
	<42CE89CA.2070607@noao.edu> <20050708143508.GD22725@wolff.to>
	<42CE96AF.3020903@noao.edu> <22916.1120836900@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<42CEA305.1050904@noao.edu>
Message-ID: <op.stlq3pkwth1vuj@localhost>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:08:03 +0200
From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?La_Boutique_Num=E9rique?=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <42CEA305.1050904@noao.edu>
User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Linux, build 1095)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.005 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200507/81
X-Sequence-Number: 22059



> which wouldn't have helped.)  If true, I can handle that parsing myself
> easily enough without exposing RelationGetNumberOfBlocks.

	Is there a way to get EXPLAIN results in a non-text-formatted way for  
easier use ?
	I'm asking, because it seems the feature set grows by the minute in  
posgres nowadays...