Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662D84758F1 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:37:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (davinci.ethosmedia.com [209.10.40.250]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA35B4758E6 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account ) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.5.9) with HTTP id 1775416; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:36:28 -0700 From: "Josh Berkus" Subject: Re: Temporary tables and indexes To: Ludwig Lim , PostgreSQL Mailing List X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.5.9 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:36:28 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20021008072844.5322.qmail@web80310.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200210/108 X-Sequence-Number: 9825 Ludwig, > Are the indices of a temporary table automatically > "dropped" together its corresponding temporary table > after a database session? I'm kind of surprised that it's possible to index a temporary table. There's not much point in doing so. Yes, the indexes would be dropped as well. -Josh Berkus