Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlWUC-003BBH-Ex for pgsql-translators@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:30:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlWTB-000gPC-Ps for pgsql-translators@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:28:58 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlWTB-000gOx-J0 for pgsql-translators@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:28:58 +0000 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlWT8-007ulB-BM for pgsql-translators@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:28:57 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498213200A06; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:28:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:28:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eisentraut.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1695828529; x=1695914929; bh=HHdKNsmZvBM2VThEIqOGYV60s 3rSpa/eLb9tICM2XZM=; b=NrCarURo1UHeIXHsCjra/EgN3LQHiH/nssPF9reZw ImQgkBniPUS0rbSk3Pe20gAva4mQvusz//lk2b4Sx2DpebkJVTLZm/slAa9m6Lx+ gBgmdCMthyq4cahKIcpvgzGhlqC91yHAh3+8Kt9uoRGXezSPfJWN0WwYO3cWNqKR zh6NxnKqN3Vlrj1dqKC33OmcV0wvV7B4EBK4ykCJPsQgNatXwSvFfDu5aW0iSweH PcFJKfzusQ4Xj0h1rsmcjpzGoD07kHkA7vhpIXW1ZjM/Lgd/N9m+QKvZIyr+p3If rbROx0m9Ez0RicCgsLylH714kHoYl9qwL3IwTaDI2nwaA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1695828529; x=1695914929; bh=HHdKNsmZvBM2VThEIqOGYV60s3rSpa/eLb9 tICM2XZM=; b=JkZji05LEy4AsCi14TWDriUwngW+JaRWs0Pm5nERRiJspacm70v KUvjsjq1XAhbKwoeH/LAOYEG9ja+zcpvOx+lfLMP4ZrO1qdVDoS0zdwkKPUigHZ8 IYj07nb4I1KpFVQ5IB09UCsmeTmaAbTFbHB4G4vDJfkFwyOQCzjlbtuH5UshTOc2 zp/IiA7YvWIKcKwuVkugvrE/roo+2c2ePIoQTMSXR4ohcwioeLZ96k7qUdkbEUph JxNPDHU/BnTYN3Sf8VujfVDhT1uVCh+BsXfj/c/KjLhvv6854f7Gn7xYzGQPzi9e sLNyl2wd4PVVh0N61SATK/0YFfU6UTeHStg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvjedrtdeggddviecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcugfhishgvnhhtrhgruhhtuceophgvthgvrhesvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtrdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetheekgeejheduhffhledtleelkeekhffgvdefuedvuddu teeuieetveetueeludenucffohhmrghinhepfhhoshguvghmrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvrhesvghishgv nhhtrhgruhhtrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ie0a040ee:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:28:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2a439909-017c-6241-e4f6-a78dc1b373af@eisentraut.org> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:28:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: Is translating server messages really worth it? Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Geoghegan , Guillaume Lelarge Cc: pgsql-translators@lists.postgresql.org References: From: Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 25.09.23 23:48, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > The 80% rule always struck me as odd. It might make sense if falling > under the threshold meant that the translation was classified as a > second tier translation, or whatever. But it's a binary pass/fail > condition -- there are no reasonable gradations. A 79% complete > translation that nobody really has access to is 100% useless. At FOSDEM 2023 [0], I discussed the 80% rule with some other translations projects (e.g., KDE), but no one else seems to have such a system, so maybe it wasn't the right idea. [0]: https://archive.fosdem.org/2023/schedule/track/translations/ One specific example of a thing I would like to avoid is that the --help output has a wild mix of translated and untranslated lines. Of course, this could be avoided by having the whole --help output as one translation catalog entry, which is exactly what we have not been doing, because that makes it harder to update between versions. So I don't know ...