Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ql5GN-0013Ed-7B for pgsql-translators@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:25:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ql5FM-00BDW9-RP for pgsql-translators@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:24:52 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ql5FM-00BDVv-Kr for pgsql-translators@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:24:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ql5FG-007f1m-C1 for pgsql-translators@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:24:51 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A748D2FAACBF for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s934.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979EA2E28F03; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s898.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s934.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955F87CEA60; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:24:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.01 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from s980.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s898.loopia.se (s898.loopia.se [172.22.190.17]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8LMTP id K13UQUmG3cnJ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:24:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s980.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AECD220168B; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.3\)) Subject: Re: Is translating server messages really worth it? From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:24:43 +0200 Cc: Guillaume Lelarge , pgsql-translators@lists.postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <61818ED1-42A1-490D-849A-724296550810@yesql.se> References: To: Peter Geoghegan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.3) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 26 Sep 2023, at 00:48, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > there are no reasonable gradations. A 79% complete > translation that nobody really has access to is 100% useless. Those 75% or 79% or whatever could also very well cover nearly 100% of the common cases, which would increase the value proposition of the translated part. It's of course impossible to say, but it doesn't seem unlikely. -- Daniel Gustafsson