Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8ZXu-0006X9-KM for pgsql-women@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:57:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8ZXt-0005Zu-61 for pgsql-women@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:57:53 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8ZXt-0005Zl-15 for pgsql-women@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:57:53 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8ZXj-0001oK-Dv for pgsql-women@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:57:51 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f14so2173100wre.4 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:57:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HX6+60GAerK7wtWo4mUS8aD6qw3DvUW3K2e8BVwI9xk=; b=RSBTJAOhaQ03M6hBzW4nvABD/2FzUxEW16TG7vNl3Np0UraCnFm2fzTFW/NpQ7qMjN 1Luycigssx2if56ETVYzTZFqqHZdRIdpO0qTtIo1j09T3RalJqyNKHKvHT604/AT68o7 Q/HmO5lZb6misjNUivDXNb8iPIqR8xQm7QEnrAqYQdQnCPLllWDNQ0gl8pFxw9t/0lvH jt8jjUl9BFjuLwbzBKDLUlj3CiRch1GR6nxYIF7rji22FlQt7CxEZdDS5CLzvXmguCCz YWoKXyjIAjR3QHOHtzhiiuBCLqMPeDYwjKqCa719hRz2IlYmDT4v4HuayLB7cBuFlAA4 0JCw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tD04gsNBKk2tvACJwlx+93aM3C27W/TY8+mM+u4e75/DS65T/ZA 7RYydjx3uKBgA8STLPuWEeaVAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4934eqxOf+mclWUiZJdt9PrhvdXGOB/+3qRUe9SWy7YpfeaG4J6XkDGkcY/XS6jz2wUYU2Nxw== X-Received: by 10.80.250.68 with SMTP id c4mr124327edq.266.1524005861142; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a03f:4ebe:3d00:f86a:535c:7e3:33bf? ([2a02:a03f:4ebe:3d00:f86a:535c:7e3:33bf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g24sm43949edj.87.2018.04.17.15.57.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: What we need to do To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=c3=a6titia_Avrot?= Cc: pgsql-women@lists.postgresql.org References: <38ee76b5-8bf5-9171-70de-f926b1e618c9@gmail.com> From: Boriss Mejias Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:57:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Hi Lætitia, Sorry for the late reply (almost a week already, times flies). Here are my thoughts. I understand that we agree that as an organization, we better work on this together, women and men. That was my first paragraph about. This seems to be kind of a consensus in the group, so I feel welcome to participate and contribute. More comments here below regarding the part where we disagree. Lætitia Avrot wrote on 12-04-18 13:48: > Hi Boriss > > > I think excluding men from certain activities can be positive in the goal of > making women feel welcomed. For instance: Women-only IRC/Slack channels can > be a good thing. Women-only Hackathon can also help in making women feel > welcomed. > > > I strongly disagree. I want everyone to feel welcome, whatever their gender is. > If you start creating little worlds without men, first you exclude people and > that's a negative message to give and then it's totally artificial as our world > is populated with both men and women. I understand your concern, and I know you don't have problems participating in a world with mostly men. I saw your presentation at FOSDEM and you didn't seem intimidated at all. But for some women, maybe it is better to give some steps in a community removing some of the barriers (fictionally, I agree), but as an intermediate step, not as a fake reality, nor as a goal. When I was in academia we often discussed the fact that so few women study informatics. A professor told us that their statistics (sorry I don't have them to confirm) showed that the percentage of women studying engineering was smaller if they were coming from a mixed-school, than from a girls-only school. Their conclusion was that women in a girls-only school didn't developed the idea that computers and science was a boy-thing, so they wouldn't be affected by that cliché when making a choice for their studies. > So if we feel there is a problem with with > women representation in our community, we need to find a solution together. Absolutely. I started reading "Lean In" by Sheryl Sandberg (I like it a lot by the way). She insists that this is something we have to work on together. She also tells some stories of her experience speaking and participating in women-only events, with very good results. Note that I'm not saying that creating women-only activities is the solution. I just feel we don't have to discard them a priori, because they seem to have a benefit for some women in the long run, as an intermediate step. I think we should evaluate this when there is a more concrete proposal. Cheers Boriss > Men > and women both have brain, so they can both come with creative ideas. > > Cheers, > > Lætitia