X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E493D9FB2B2 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:18:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54632-10 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4559FB2AA for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:18:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GB6fy-000EYL-8t for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:02 +0000 Received: from 192.168.1.106 ([192.168.1.106]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Dave Page" Subject: Re: captcha Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:18:58 +0100 Message-ID: <000301c6bc5d$e1649697$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk> Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 To: "Gavin M. Roy" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thread-topic: [pgsql-www] captcha thread-index: Aca8XeFkqpoS9rcYSOqFWoFgxAKB9A== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200608/83 X-Sequence-Number: 10474 -----Original Message----- From: "Gavin M. Roy" To: "pgsql-www@postgresql.org" Sent: 10/08/06 03:57 Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] captcha > I find it hard to believe it's against the law for an individual or =20 > non-commercial/non-business group to make an inaccessible website. =20 > then according to constitute the provision of a service, or they are related to =20 education." We provide an open site intended for the use of the general public, which a= ccording to our DDA advisors (and auditors) are covered (we also host some = non-business sites). And really, it's no more wonky than some .us laws, and= at least it has a good purpose. Regardless of the uk law though there is no good reason to make anything in= accessible for the sake of a little effort - we've gotten complaints about = that numerous times in the past wrt fonts & colors etc. /D