X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB429DD784 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:58:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40707-09 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:58:55 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124329DD77B for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:58:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1EiIvi-0005hW-Ci for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:58:58 +0000 Received: from 192.168.1.106 ([192.168.1.106]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:58:58 +0000 From: "Dave Page" To: , Cc: Subject: Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 Message-ID: <009401c5f78b$98f9f4f0$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:58:50 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 Thread-Index: AcX3i5j54gaCTUu3Roasyp2tJBrVHA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.841 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.562, MSGID_DOLLARS=2.163, RATWARE_MS_HASH=1.379, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME=1.861] X-Spam-Score: 2.841 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Archive-Number: 200512/41 X-Sequence-Number: 8982 -----Original Message----- From: "Josh Berkus" Sent: 02/12/05 21:36:51 To: "Robert Treat" Cc: "pgsql-www@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 > Gee, and you wondered why I thought we need a seperate mailing list? = This=20 > sort of response is *exactly* why. Trying desparately not to say "I told you so" I very much doubt you have = got this response had you raised this here in the first place and not = later when persuaded to do so.=20 Now, perhaps we can put the rocky start to one side and get on with = building a knowledgebase? Regards, Dave -----Unmodified Original Message----- Robert, > This is a joke. If you invite all the people on this list to join that > list, you haven't actually prevented the "fragile corporate types" = from > interacting with the "grotty techno-luddites" which claim to be so > important. Gee, and you wondered why I thought we need a seperate mailing list? = This=20 sort of response is *exactly* why. --=20 --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match