public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedRe: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
4+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
@ 2005-12-03 20:56 Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:10 ` Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2005-12-03 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Berkus"<[email protected]>
Sent: 03/12/05 20:15:02
To: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Cc: "Jim Nasby"<[email protected]>, "Gevik babakhani"<[email protected]>, "Dave Page"<[email protected]>, "Denis Lussier"<[email protected]>, "Scott Yara"<[email protected]>, "Marc Fournier"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "Andy Astor"<[email protected]>, "Stephen Slezak"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "Shahzad Khokhar"<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
> 1) Should be part of www.postgresql.org or be kb.postgresql.org.
Aside from being a dubious "business requirement" imho, I should remind you that a decision was made long ago by the community to merge all the postgresql.org subsites together, and not to create new ones. Reviewing and potentially overturning that decision is definitely not something for this forum.
Regards, Dave
-----Unmodified Original Message-----
So, can we start composing business requirements?
I can think of a few:
1) Should be part of www.postgresql.org or be kb.postgresql.org.
2) Should support full-text, category, date, and author searching.
3) Should publish credit for submitters and sponsors of articles.
4) Should manage bi-directional translation of articles.
5) Should be extremely easy to write & edit articles, requiring no
knowledge of HTML or CVS or other command-line techniques.
6) Should support an approval process for both new articles and edits.
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
2005-12-03 20:56 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
@ 2005-12-03 21:10 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josh Berkus @ 2005-12-03 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
Dave,
> > 1) Should be part of www.postgresql.org or be kb.postgresql.org.
>
> Aside from being a dubious "business requirement" imho, I should remind
> you that a decision was made long ago by the community to merge all the
> postgresql.org subsites together, and not to create new ones. Reviewing
> and potentially overturning that decision is definitely not something
> for this forum.
Huh? I don't get it. How does "part of www.postgresql.org" contradict
that?
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
@ 2005-12-03 21:30 Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:45 ` Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2005-12-03 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Berkus"<[email protected]>
Sent: 03/12/05 21:05:59
To: "Dave Page"<[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
> Huh? I don't get it. How does "part of www.postgresql.org" contradict
> that?
It doesn't, but kb.postgresql.org would as it would be a separate site. I don't object to something like that being proposed, but given the previous decision (which goes back to around the launch of the previous www site iirc), it should be proposed in the right place.
Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or not to make that proposal.
Regards, Dave
-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Dave,
> > 1) Should be part of www.postgresql.org or be kb.postgresql.org.
>
> Aside from being a dubious "business requirement" imho, I should remind
> you that a decision was made long ago by the community to merge all the
> postgresql.org subsites together, and not to create new ones. Reviewing
> and potentially overturning that decision is definitely not something
> for this forum.
Huh? I don't get it. How does "part of www.postgresql.org" contradict
that?
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
2005-12-03 21:30 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
@ 2005-12-03 21:45 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josh Berkus @ 2005-12-03 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
Dave,
> Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or
> not to make that proposal.
Right, the proposal would be "www.postgresql.org or kb.postgresql.org".
Presumably, the WWW group would decide on www.postgresql.org.
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-03 21:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-03 20:56 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:10 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:30 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:45 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox