Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Status update
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:58:54 +0100
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF218@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Status update
thread-index: AcNvQSDKCyXtyZBrSRONydn7cAoh4wGzz+Bg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <webmaster@letzplay.de>, <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Grabm=FCller [mailto:webmaster@letzplay.de]=20
> Sent: 30 August 2003 22:55
> To: Dave Page; webmaster@letzplay.de; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Status update
>=20
>=20
> Hi Dave,
>=20
> It *should* work fine - there are many .htm files in the=20
> cache directory, also the layout and files directory. The=20
> only thing missing is a nice index page and they can simply=20
> mirror the cache directory. The only pages not=20
> cached/mirrored currently are download.htm and mirrors.htm as=20
> the mirrors-near-you-feature need php.

Hi Andreas,

Sorry for the delay, however I've been extremely busy recently.

It looks good to me from here - I have rsync'd a copy, and that seems OK. I=
 take it the idea is that the tools/rebuildcache script will replace the cu=
rrent scripts that build the whole site? How quickly does it run - the curr=
ent stuff takes only a few minutes.

If you can sort a mirrorable index page, and bring the content/design up to=
 date then I think we're ready to go.

What does everyone else think? I'd like to hear more opinions before making=
 such a large change to the site live.

Regards, Dave.