X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC57D1B542; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:08:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14945-02; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:07:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from salem.vale-housing.co.uk (mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk [80.176.1.146]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAF0D1B540; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:07:57 -0300 (ADT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: 'Official' Interfaces X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:07:56 +0100 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] 'Official' Interfaces thread-index: AcODaAkFmvHeFBYVQt+qcXpTih93AgADrFbQ From: "Dave Page" To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Justin Clift" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/106 X-Sequence-Number: 2574 > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20 > Sent: 25 September 2003 14:23 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Justin Clift; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] 'Official' Interfaces >=20 >=20 >=20 > why not a simple "poll" listing the interfaces, and based on=20 > votes (ie. # of ppl using that interface), it rises to the=20 > top of the lists? Let usage denote "best" ... if it isn't,=20 > nobody would be using it, would they? That's not a bad idea. We could do the same for admin interfaces.... Regards, Dave.