X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352C2D1B51C for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:29:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38171-07 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:29:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from salem.vale-housing.co.uk (mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk [80.176.1.146]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF51D1B50B for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:29:08 -0400 (AST) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Old revised version, and a new one Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:29:09 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B871FF86@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Old revised version, and a new one thread-index: AcOqTpqMpfTXG0p+Sh6tw0Ef4Rj5xwAOkJRw From: "Dave Page" To: "Michael Glaesemann" Cc: , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/206 X-Sequence-Number: 2853 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:grzm@myrealbox.com]=20 > Sent: 14 November 2003 01:28 > To: Dave Page > Cc: webmaster@letzplay.de; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Old revised version, and a new one >=20 > And I was running into problems with column width with words=20 > not fitting into the 120px columns defined by the ads. I do=20 > think 120px is a little narrow, making it harder to read=20 > longer descriptions (due to line breaks) or even using longer=20 > words in some cases. What are your thoughts on increasing the=20 > left and right borders on the ads to make the columns wider? Ahh, a sense of d=E9j=E0 vu!! The problem with increasing the left/right ad borders is that you then need= to do the top/bottom as well or it just looks wrong. One this I did try previously that I seem to recall I liked but Marc wasn't= so keen on (though maybe not for this reason) was including a solid title = bar just below the header, right the way across. It also had a thin white b= order all round so it looked like a completely standalone entity. It gives = just enough of a break that the columns no longer need to line up with the = ads (though they should still look even). Regards, Dave.