X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01627D1B544 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:52:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47304-10 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 05:51:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from salem.vale-housing.co.uk (mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk [80.176.1.146]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC801D1B51C for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 05:51:34 -0400 (AST) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Old revised version, and a new one Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:51:35 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B871FF89@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Old revised version, and a new one thread-index: AcOqk2OpiC8tCIEeQL2dnv5akPwwBwAAWvfw From: "Dave Page" To: "Michael Glaesemann" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/210 X-Sequence-Number: 2857 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:grzm@myrealbox.com]=20 > Sent: 14 November 2003 09:41 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Old revised version, and a new one >=20 >=20 > On Friday, November 14, 2003, at 05:24 PM, Dave Page wrote: > >> From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:grzm@myrealbox.com] As for 4, the=20 > >> two options that spring to mind are changing the color of=20 > the text or=20 > >> making the text bold > > > > Make the colour navy blue or something similar. >=20 > I'll give it a shot. >=20 > > There was one thing - the text around the language box is invisible=20 > > unless you select it, but even then it seems to flash somewhat=20 > > bizarrely. Screenshots attached. >=20 > Talk about service! Thanks for the pics. This is what you=20 > were talking about before, We aim to please :-) > > (aside from the fact that some of the text doesn't even display in=20 > > IE6). >=20 > Right?=20 Yup. > I'll look into it. A brief google on "css ie6 hidden text"=20 > brought up a couple different mailing list threads. It seems=20 > IE6 has issues with padding and divs, so hopefully I'll be=20 > able to find a good workaround. :-) Regards, Dave.