X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0D8D1B42F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:56:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93087-01 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:55:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C05D1B480 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:55:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ATn1C-000PHM-0V; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:55:34 +0000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.org v3 -- Progress? Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:55:34 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8720200@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org v3 -- Progress? thread-index: AcO+fceVZ0sKFhPbSjWIK55GSbr9SwABmg2w From: "Dave Page" To: "Josh Berkus" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/56 X-Sequence-Number: 3116 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]=20 > Sent: 09 December 2003 17:55 > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org v3 -- Progress? >=20 > People, >=20 > First of all, I posted questions regarding getting=20 > jobs.postgresql.org built last week and received no feedback=20 > whatsoever other than a request for the=20 > PDF from Francisco. Is everybody on vacation? No, just very busy with uni work (in my case anyhoo). I finish this module tomorrow, and with the exception of having to come up with a dissertation topic (suggestions *very* welcome - it's for an MSc in IT) I'm now on a break until February so will hopefully have a bit more time free. I'm fairly indifferent about how the site is designed from a s/w spec point of view. What I do think matters is: - the design should match what we're aiming for on the portal (the most common complaint I hear is that all our sites look different). - the look and feel should be centralised so we can update the design of the entire site by changing only a single stylesheet and template or similar. - Ideally please use PHP/PostgreSQL as that is what most of us know. As for your pal putting his name on his work, I think that is only fair if he is doing the work, as long as it is not obtrusive. > Second, my web guru pointed out to me that in addition to=20 > www.postgresql.org being multi-language, some parts of the=20 > web site need to be multi-*locale* as=20 > well. For example, News, Events, Jobs, etc. Just because=20 > the Spanish and=20 > the Mexicans speak the same language it doesn't mean that the=20 > Spanish want to know about training courses in Jalisco. I assume that's fairly easy isn't it Andreas? Just a case of using the full identifier in the code (eg pt_BR for Brazilian Portuguese or pt_PT for Portuguese Portuguese). > Thirdly, and most importantly: A professional design firm=20 > has offered their=20 > pro-bono help with web design (they are PostgreSQL users).=20=20=20 > Do we want them=20 > involved in the WWW effort, and if so, how? I think we need some commitment of the work being undertaken by the rest of the team first - our major problem seems to be that although we're all basically enthusiastic, we're all pretty busy. I think the main priorities right now should be v3.0, but then there is also a new techdocs site to consider as well. So, Andreas, Michael et al. can you let us know if you have any sort of roadmap for getting v3 live? Cheers, Dave.