content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:38:40 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8720497@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
Thread-Index: AcPbhRKJ11v/KBjhRBSmMpeARrArsQAAJzxg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off@cs.msu.su>, <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]=20
> Sent: 15 January 2004 16:31
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Alexey Borzov; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
>=20
> >=20
> > The DB schema is not in the CVS at present. I'm not convinced it=20
> > should
> > be: Developers working elsewhere will need data as well as schema,=20
> > however, the data is purposefully not included as it makes=20
> the dump a=20
> > very large file.
> >=20
> > Happy to hear suggestions for handling that little problem...
> >=20
>=20
> ISTM development no on the server is orders of magnitude=20
> harder without having a database available to hit against.

'Tis also difficult without any content to work with. Maybe we should
have a link to a nightly dump of the schema only and the schema + data?
That way, developers can grab whichever they want.

Thoughts?

Regards, Dave.