X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2980D1D286; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:39:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94246-09; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:39:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C77D1C7F0; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:39:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AneIg-0008j9-0X; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 13:39:42 +0000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Postgresql.org search engine. Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:39:36 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206C9@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Postgresql.org search engine. thread-index: AcPpEPMG0TEbIAJ7SZWeU0t2bsTEjgAfucvA From: "Dave Page" To: "Marc G. Fournier" , "Oleg Bartunov" Cc: "Josh Berkus" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/10 X-Sequence-Number: 3575 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20 > Sent: 01 February 2004 22:12 > To: Oleg Bartunov > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Josh Berkus; Dave Page; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Postgresql.org search engine. >=20 > And let me know if the headers look right to you ... I took=20 > out the Cache-control stuff ... >=20 > Let me know if there is anything else you'd like to see in there ... It looks even more complex to me now - there are what, 6 include files? How about something more simple: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >There shouldn't be any tangents or general discussion on
-advocacy
> >either -- that's what -general is for.  A one-time incident
should not
> >lead to such drastic measures.  If the marketing plan is no
longer
> >discussed on -advocacy, what is?
> >
> >
> I disagree whole heartedly. If you look at general, it is basically
> PostgreSQL-Support.



=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Header.php then may look something like: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
<? php echo $subject ?>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D And footer.php (minus and footers we might add). =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D In addition, there is an awful lot of HTML comments that mhonarc has added: As examples. These seem somewhat extranous and could be removed for ease of reading and disk space/bandwidth usage reduction. Oh, and on the current version the noindex tags seem to be in the wrong places. On the index/thread pages for example, they should enclose all the hyperlinks. The noindex tags do not stop links being followed, just the text within them from being included in the index. Regards, Dave.