X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 03DF3D1D9E6; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 16:16:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 67537-04; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:16:14 -0400 (AST)
Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.85]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A8C4CD1D98A; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:16:13 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146]
	helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1Angk8-000Jbf-0Z; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:16:12 +0000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Subject: Re: projects.postgresql.net
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:16:11 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206CD@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net
thread-index: AcPpoEoS0KPWoxIcRvmST+1CjVHO6QAB3cIQ
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	<pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200402/25
X-Sequence-Number: 3590

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20
> Sent: 02 February 2004 15:14
> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net
>=20
>=20
>=20
>    Thoughts?  Useless idea?  Bad idea?  Waste of time and energy?

Sounds good to me. Should probably check we have an adequate policy for
the use of the space...

Regards Dave.