Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: projects.postgresql.net 
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:23:16 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206CF@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net 
thread-index: AcPpp7XrjFdz4xgBTA+TFe+dVLfAqAAAL6jQ
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
 "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20
> Sent: 02 February 2004 15:48
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net=20
>=20
>=20
> We can use .org, it just means that its more difficult to=20
> automate the process of setting up a new project, since DNS=20
> would have to be modified for each new one ...

Not to mention that we may have problems if someone registers a project
in a generic name that we later want to use for some reason (for
example, someone starts a search engine project and simply calls it
'search').

I would vote to keep it all in it's own domain.

On that note though Marc, any thoughts on automatically adding such
sites to the indexer?

Regards, Dave.