X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 499EDD1B45B; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 16:30:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 72274-06; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:30:31 -0400 (AST)
Received: from anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F3900D1B53C; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:30:30 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146]
	helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1Angxw-000Gka-0b; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:30:28 +0000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Subject: Re: projects.postgresql.net 
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:30:28 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206D0@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net 
thread-index: AcPpqMPU7S9vQxOkR7y3fyWq1m6TLQAAHhPg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
 "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200402/31
X-Sequence-Number: 3596

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20
> Sent: 02 February 2004 16:17
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net=20
>=20
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>=20
> > Well, it simplifies things right now.  What about mirroring though?
> > When the .net area gets large enough to need to be split across=20
> > multiple servers, will there be a problem?
>=20
> Good point ... so we need to DNS each project name individually ...

Is it likely to grow that much? I would expect most of the large files
to be in Gborg in the CVS repo or the downloads areas. How big has Gborg
got? Also, bear in mind that simple mirroring isn't a problem as 2
servers may be mirrored and both Ips listed against *.postgresql.net) -
splitting the sites across 2 or more servers would be more difficult.

Regards, Dave.