X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C26BD1B4BE; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79463-01; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:39:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80022D1B4B7; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:39:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Anh6G-000JeP-0U; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:39:04 +0000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: projects.postgresql.net Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:39:03 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206D3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net thread-index: AcPpqr0KNmSrnPsUQfmRvb6+Om+1pAAADQ2Q From: "Dave Page" To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Tom Lane" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/35 X-Sequence-Number: 3600 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20 > Sent: 02 February 2004 16:32 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Tom Lane; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net=20 >=20 > But I do agree that the site would have to be quite large to=20 > become a problem ... I can see gborg needing to be spread=20 > across two servers first, since that is where the brunt of=20 > the work will be done ... Just out of interest, how big is it now? I imagine that splitting that would be a job and a half :-( /D