X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C82FD1B8CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:50:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82495-10 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:50:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6811DD1B57C for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:50:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Ardht-000OGC-0Z; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:50:13 +0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Another update on 'portal' X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:50:13 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F32A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Another update on 'portal' Thread-Index: AcPyL76OOl5V1BWGTJ+iFIDcc4yt8gACDhxA From: "Dave Page" To: "Alexey Borzov" Cc: , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/66 X-Sequence-Number: 3631 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20 > Sent: 13 February 2004 12:48 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; webmaster@letzplay.de > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Another update on 'portal' >=20 > Hi! >=20 > Dave Page wrote: > >>Uploaded another attempt: > >>http://oc.cs.msu.su/pgorg/ (trailing slash is REQUIRED) > >=20 > > OK, looks good - however the trailing / think *must* be=20 > fixed before=20 > > this can be used. >=20 > I don't think this is top priority as the final version will=20 > be put in the webserver's root... But I'll try to fix this. You mean it won't be affected by: http://www.postgresql.org vs http://www.postgresql.org/ ? If so, then no, that's not such a priority. >=20 > Well, my attitude worked once again! I didn't receive any=20 > real comments for my previous mail without "the attitude": > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-02/msg00046.php Not really as your previous email is already flagged for followup I just hadn't got to it until today. > BTW, what's your personal priority: "getting the job done" or=20 > "the attitude"? They are not mutually exclusive. Regards, Dave.