X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3AAD1DA5F for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:32:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03519-10 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:32:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9656AD1D66C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:32:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Arw9w-000FXe-0Y; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:32:24 +0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Another update on 'portal' X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:32:24 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F342@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Another update on 'portal' Thread-Index: AcPy1T8y03X741cmR5+Cp6RGboM6zgABpeuQ From: "Dave Page" To: "Alexey Borzov" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/71 X-Sequence-Number: 3636 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20 > Sent: 14 February 2004 08:34 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Another update on 'portal' >=20 > Well, it took you almost a week *not* to answer to the=20 > previous --- polite --- email and less than an hour to answer=20 > to the current one. See my point? Not really. As I imagine many other ppl do, I set aside time on Fridays to tie up outstanding items. Also like many of us, I have a job, family and studies to worry about as well and don't always have time to answer immediately. > I consulted the pgsql-www archives and looked at some other=20 > lists and have seen > *lots* of polite website suggestions safely and comfortably ignored. Not on pgsql-www I doubt. On other lists maybe, but then, *this* is the web list, not them. > Thus the srategy of writing politely definitely does not work=20 > with PostgreSQL website team, and I see no real reason to=20 > pursue it. The strategy of writing to the right list and being polite does work. The problem is that people do not forget when you annoyed them the week before, so vanishing for a while and then coming back as if nothing happened ain't gonna help. Now, let's get this straight. Polite please from now on, and if no-one responds to a message try a polite 'hey guys, I emailed but no one responded' message. Any further unpleasentness may result in an unsubscription. Now, let's not discuss this any further and get back to developing the website in whatever free time we can find. Regards, Dave.