X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB53DD1C9FB for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:10:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00164-01 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:10:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91619D1C513 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:10:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1As4Fj-000Fkp-0Y; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:10:55 +0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: development questions (was: Re: Another update on 'portal') X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:10:55 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F349@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: development questions (was: Re: [pgsql-www] Another update on 'portal') Thread-Index: AcPzIFmsv92dbAj2RaKYEx3wuvSQfgABExDA From: "Dave Page" To: , Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/76 X-Sequence-Number: 3641 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Grabm=FCller [mailto:webmaster@letzplay.de]=20 > Sent: 14 February 2004 17:35 > To: borz_off@cs.msu.su; Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: development questions (was: Re: [pgsql-www]=20 > Another update on 'portal') >=20 > When I saw Alexeys posts, I decided to not answer them - it's=20 > difficult for me to have an objective opinion as I simply=20 > don't like the way Alexey came in and said "everything you do=20 > sucks, what I do is the only right way you can do that". That=20 > makes me think "what the hell does that guy want from us?".=20 > However, let me try it. Thanks :-) > I have reviewed the code and it looks good - most of it seems=20 > to work, much of my code has been optimized. OK. > I can't say if this code is good or this code is bad. He did=20 > the changes he stated in his mail, and they seem to work and=20 > the code techincally looks good (at least better than mine).=20 > The question is, do we want to have this changes? I like the=20 > template usage and the new path format page.html.{ln}. I=20 > personally don't like the usage of gettext as for me this=20 > seems to be overhead - before we had a php file containing=20 > all variables, now we have several .po etc. files which have=20 > to be edited by special software (I think?). All this is just=20 > a question of the personal point of view. Well, I'm not a translator, but I know ppl that are. We use gettext both in= pgAdmin III (which supports over 30 languages, at least a couple of which = are rtl iirc) and on it's website and my understanding is that it is a nice= and convenient method. Apps like poEdit make it easy to see untranslated o= r updated strings and translate them. Also, Peter Eisentraut suggested gett= ext and he is certainly experienced in these issues. So, are we happy to update CVS and whichever dev vhost you are using to thi= s version and think about what else needs doing before we can go live? Regards, Dave.