X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EADD1E146; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:59:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92053-01; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:59:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB38D1E136; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:59:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AtYmq-000KXe-0b; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:59:16 +0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: putting up modified 'portal' X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:59:16 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F3E9@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] putting up modified 'portal' Thread-Index: AcP2TfbDS5n7CqYjQPq1vvrAGucbngAEpoBQ From: "Dave Page" To: , , Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/131 X-Sequence-Number: 3696 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Grabm=FCller [mailto:webmaster@letzplay.de]=20 > Sent: 18 February 2004 18:38 > To: scrappy@postgresql.org; borz_off@cs.msu.su > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] putting up modified 'portal' >=20 > I've now applied your new code (please note I have not=20 > changed anything so your hacks do still exist). >=20 > However, I don't think it makes much sense to work this way.=20 > As it seems we can't give Alexey access to only one single=20 > module, what about creating a new project on gborg=20 > (postgresql.org 3.0 or something like that) where we can play=20 > without affecting anything on the current website? No. There is no need for a new project. Once Alexey has proven himself as *= everyone* has to (including myself), then we will give him CVS write access= . Until then patches may be produced against CVS and applied by one of us.= =20 One of the things I will be doing at some point is reworking things to upda= te from CVS during site builds so from then on we will all work in scratch = copies and commit changes to CVS (unlike currently when some of us work in = the live version). Working this way will mean that CVS write access will ha= ve to be as tightly controlled as write access to the docroot itself. Regards, Dave.