X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED94D1E14C for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:28:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62522-04 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:28:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BA3D1E14B for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:28:28 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AtjXu-000Gxk-0V; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:28:34 +0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Mirror how-to? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:28:34 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F3F0@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Mirror how-to? Thread-Index: AcP2wKT2pEFfWjiSRyidNscXsRrJmAAAPpmg From: "Dave Page" To: "elein" , "Devrim GUNDUZ" Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/133 X-Sequence-Number: 3698 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: elein [mailto:elein@varlena.com]=20 > Sent: 19 February 2004 04:11 > To: Devrim GUNDUZ > Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Mirror how-to? >=20 > Can I take this and publish it more or less as is (perhaps=20 > with the rsync command line, too, though) in an article=20 > General Bits to promote more mirroring? The final version is online now at http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors-howto.html. Feel free to publish it, but I must admit to starting to think that maybe we have enough mirrors now - as I type there are 77 ftp mirrors and 49 web mirrors that are active, and a lot more that are currently offline for whatever reason. That's starting to be a lot of bandwidth just to keep them sync'ed up and we know from a previous stats exercise that some of them get very few hits.=20 What do others think? Regards Dave.