content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Feeds Integration
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:07:04 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Feeds Integration
Thread-Index: AcP31i/ObALwy1a8Qp6kSZPYNfb4CQADcpmA
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <josh@agliodbs.com>, "David Costa" <geeks@dotgeek.org>,
	"PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]=20
> Sent: 20 February 2004 17:22
> To: Dave Page; David Costa; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Feeds Integration
>=20
> Dave,
>=20
> > I thought we had agreed not to do that in the end?
>=20
> Had we?   When?=20=20=20
>=20
> My memory ... and e-mailbox ... was that the discussion had=20
> been tabled because of the lack of an administrator for=20
> GForge, and the amount of effort required to migrate off GBorg.

Well I don't remember the administrator thing, but yes, my recollection
is that we had shelved the idea due to the difficulty in migrating
people from one platform to the other.

> However, a number of things have come up in the last few=20
> months to make the use of a better collaboration tool more=20
> compelling -- enough so that I'm=20
> willing to put some work behind it.=20=20

What's come up recently? I don't remember seeing anything.

Still, perhaps it would be worth asking the project owners what they
would like to do? As admin for a few myself I would vote against a move.
At least one of them would require significant work on my part to
migrate.

Regards, Dave.