content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:11:20 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Thread-Index: AcP36ygAHWxCgvmuQ7OUdcvf98olwQAAa3tw
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	"PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]=20
> Sent: 20 February 2004 19:25
> To: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
>=20
> Dave,

Hi Josh,

> > What's come up recently? I don't remember seeing anything.
>=20
> It wasn't on public lists, mostly.   Let's just say that a=20
> few people are=20
> *very* dissatisfied with GBorg and might like to try=20
> something else.   Also,=20
> we've been discussing having a bug tracking utility for the=20
> main project, particularly for the 7.5 release.

That one's been going on on and off for years! Still, I don't think it
would be a bad idea. Even Linux has proper bug tracking these days.

> HOWEVER, this is all hypothetical.    I need to poll this=20
> list and Hackers=20
> first and get a vote from people, as well as having an=20
> organized proposal -- which is going to wait until we have a=20
> blank GForge up and running on Hub.org=20
> first.    So let's postpone the rest of the discussion until=20
> that happens,=20
> hey?

Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I think
any voting/discussions/whatever should include the choice of new
platform.=20

It's also normal to have the discussion before a vote rather than the
other way round as you are proposing (unless I misunderstand what you've
written), so that people can make a properly informed vote.

Regards, Dave.