X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162C0D1CA6C for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:40:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44810-07 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:40:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F1ED1B53C for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:40:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B0No4-000OZx-0Y; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 16:40:44 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Archives Search Broken Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:40:44 -0000 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5CB@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Archives Search Broken Thread-Index: AcQFKxnJFpLKn+NWQiyU8owcSyqejQAAMvRw From: "Dave Page" To: , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/54 X-Sequence-Number: 3870 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]=20 > Sent: 08 March 2004 16:33 > To: Dave Page; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Archives Search Broken >=20 > Dave, >=20 > > Though strangely it now seems to work... >=20 > I still get nothing. I've tried on both Konqueror & Firefox=20 > in case it's a=20 > browser issue. Odd thing is, the search returns in about=20 > 0.5 seconds ...=20 > which is *awfully* fast considering I'm on wireless. It's=20 > like it's not=20 > even running a search, just immediately returning "no results". >=20 > AHA! Found the problem, I think. I was assuming that "in=20 > the last month"=20 > meant "in the last 30 days". I think ASPSeek interprets=20 > "in the last=20 > month" to mean *this* month, i.e. March. This would explain=20 > the results I'm=20 > getting for several queries. In addition it may take a week or so for new posts to get indexed. There is a mechanism for feeding new data directly into the index using an XML data feed, however this will take significant work to implement for the archives. In the meantime there is a simple weekly index cycle. Regards, Dave.