X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C1DD1DB49
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Mar 2004 17:18:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 58432-04
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Mar 2004 13:18:39 -0400 (AST)
Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.90])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A3ED1D18D
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Mon,  8 Mar 2004 13:18:38 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146]
	helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1B0OOj-0004qw-0W; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:18:38 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:18:37 -0000
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5D3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Update on 'portal' changes
Thread-Index: AcQFMGVTyXLDdVbrSq+eZ7i2E2yuXAAANwkQ
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/58
X-Sequence-Number: 3874

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20
> Sent: 08 March 2004 17:11
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Update on 'portal' changes
>=20
>=20
> OK, let's paraphrase: what is the reason for having one=20
> project for all websites instead of one project per website?=20
> I got the impression that *different* developers work on=20
> different websites...

Only recently. In the past that was not so much the case.

> > We *have* created a separate CVS module which should be more than=20
> > enough segregation.
>=20
> Can CVS write access be given for this module only?

No, unfortunately not.

Regards, Dave.