X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F94D1D206
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:16:29 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 88589-09
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:16:28 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.89])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16F6D1D290
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:16:25 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146]
	helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BGNCs-000Bt3-0V; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:16:26 +0100
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Server Upgrade: Neptune - Saturday, April 24th]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:16:26 +0100
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FAF5@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [Fwd: Server Upgrade: Neptune - Saturday,
 April 24th]
Thread-Index: AcQnw7wnN/Bikn5eRnOwcU1xTxrddwAEU3Sw
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <jclift@digitaldistribution.com>, <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200404/190
X-Sequence-Number: 4294

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Clift [mailto:justin@postgresql.org]=20
> Sent: 21 April 2004 18:07
> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgsql-www] [Fwd: Server Upgrade: Neptune -=20
> Saturday, April 24th]
>=20
> Hi guys,
>=20
> Just had a thought... I'm still getting these from AMS.=20=20
> Probably because we've got an AMS account with my name on it=20
> for lodging issues with.
>=20
> Would it be better for AMS to be updated with the pgsql-www@=20
> email address or something as I'm focused elsewhere these days.
>=20
> :-)

They do go to webmaster@. You are still named as the customer though...

Regards, Dave.