X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A0FD1BB07 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 05:51:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84252-10 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 05:51:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BEAD1BAEC for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 05:51:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BNpSA-000PCJ-0Z; Wed, 12 May 2004 09:51:02 +0100 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Status update on "new" website, testing needed Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:50:59 +0100 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FD20@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Status update on "new" website, testing needed thread-index: AcQ3+3blEjCb6Z+0SMyc0hG17VaDjwAAiAQw From: "Dave Page" To: "Alexey Borzov" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200405/31 X-Sequence-Number: 4410 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20 > Sent: 12 May 2004 09:30 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Status update on "new" website,=20 > testing needed >=20 > Hi! >=20 > Dave Page wrote: > > Looks very good to me - nice work. The only couple of=20 > things I noticed=20 > > in my 10 minutes tour are: > >=20 > > - The 7.4 docs are not listed on the docs page >=20 > Yes, and that's exactly the thing I called "content- and=20 > design-related issues". Yes, I realise that - just pointing it out in case you had a todo list. =20 > Someone'll have to go over the templates and sync 'em with=20 > the current site. Perhaps you could summarise what needs checking - for example, does any of the DB stuff need resyncing, or is it just static pages? > This someone should also probably be a native English=20 > speaking, unlike me. >=20 > > - You cannot preview news/events from the admin pages (at least, I=20 > > couldn't see how) >=20 > Hmm. I can add a preview feature as a JS popup window which=20 > will use the site's CSS. How does this sound? Currently we fire it off in the original php page that used to be displayed. Now of course, the site displays the statically generated version but in theory that looks the same as the active version. If you can make the popup use the same format template and css as the user will actually see, then I think that would be the best option. Regards, Dave