Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Design Rough
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:33:11 +0100
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FD3E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Design Rough
thread-index: AcQ4zQq+QMfAAD4uRIekM9fodf2YVwAABTXg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off@cs.msu.su>,
	"Michael Glaesemann" <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Cc: "Gavin M. Roy" <gmr@ehpg.net>, <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20
> Sent: 13 May 2004 10:28
> To: Michael Glaesemann
> Cc: Gavin M. Roy; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Design Rough
>=20
> 1) Modern browsers are perfectly capable of resizing the=20
> fonts if there sizes are set in points.
> 2) Browsers have wildly different ideas about what 'small'=20
> and 'x-small'=20
> are. That's why the menu on current PostgreSQL site is=20
> readable in some browsers and completely unreadable in=20
> others. Do we want repeating it?

The reason we use x-small etc. is because we got so many complaints when
using other methods such as pt, px, % and so on.=20

Regards, Dave